贫民窟里的百万富翁的英语影评如题.50--80个词，

精选知识

This is a story about one path leading to the final success is people's endurance and resolution,of course,some certain good luck also count.Let's give some further explanation about this path.First of all,as an indispensible element resulting in success,endurance plays an important role in the course of people's life.Directly speaking,it's hard for people to get to his destination without it.As for the resolution,just like the hero performing in this movie,determines his final fate.He has dream in his deepest heart,and he has the resolution to make it come true,eventually,by means of it,his dream has been realized.Above these elements mentioned above,good luck is also important.Sometimes,it can help push things forward.In all,we can not be of successful without our hard work.

或者：

The whole story tells us that anyone have a chance to succeed if we have faith in ourselves and stick to it,never give up!No matter how hard it will be,we should always face the fact and try our best to conquer the enermy,just like the actor in the film.Nothing can stop us from struggling on the road to success.The most important thing that we should remember is JUST DO IT!

其他类似问题

问题1：《贫民窟的百万富翁》英文观后感一定要自己写的80~120词左右,不一定很多,真实感受就好[英语科目]

This is a story about one path leading to the final success is people's endurance and resolution,of course,some certain good luck also count.

Let's give some further explanation about this path.First of all,as an indispensible element resulting in success,endurance plays an important role in the course of people's life.Directly speaking,it's hard for people to get to his destination without it.As for the resolution,just like the hero performing in this movie,determines his final fate.He has dream in his deepest heart,and he has the resolution to make it come true,eventually,by means of it,his dream has been realized.

Above these elements mentioned above,good luck is also important.Sometimes,it can help push things forward.

In all,we can not be of successful without our hard work.

问题2：高分求《贫民窟的百万富翁》的英文影评和中文翻译[英语科目]

　　《贫民窟的百万富翁》的得与失

　　《贫民窟的百万富翁》很容易就抓住观众的心,靠“开心辞典”似的样式去揭露印度的生活,确实新颖不少.当然,答题只是外套,所有的题目其实就是根据故事情节来编造,就像先射击后画靶心一样,套用电影里的一句话：一切都是命中注定.只不过主宰者不是主持人,而是导演.

　　我听闻印度贫富差距明显、宗教矛盾冲突,也对其脏、乱、差略有了解,只是电影里毫无掩饰的展示出来时还是颇为震惊.我不知道其中描述是否是印度生活的真实情况,导演作为外国人,究竟是对印度文化不了解还是因为没有顾虑而缺少限制,最终呈现的人生百态,使我们看到生活在底层的人们,遭受地位的下贱、生活的困窘和生命的威胁,人生的拼搏方向也就有了不同,最终导致命运殊途.这样的题材其实已经不新鲜,但电影又有多少新鲜的题材可以挖掘?换一种方式、换一个背景描述,依然具有巨大的震撼力.

　　然而我们不得不承认,电影里所呈现的一些恶劣现象即使是在中国也并不鲜见：警察审判随意殴打、流氓横行无忌、歧视打工仔和穷人……所以我们没有理由也没有资格去鄙视一个超级大国的内部矛盾,只是我们或许是并不严重,或许是控制得好,仅此而已.从这部电影里让我们看到了一个发展中国家在发展中的重重矛盾,对我们自己也是有启发意义的吧!

　　电影的一大亮点是演员找得准,特别是三个主角,从小时到成年各是三个人扮演,却给人感觉不出有何脱节.三个人长得很像,同时演技也能出色发挥,能够让人沉浸在剧中不致突然间的不适应,过度自然可见导演功力深厚.

　　"Slums millionaire" the gains and losses

　　"Slums millionaire" it's easy to seize the audience's heart, and relying on "Happy Dictionary"-like style to expose Indian life, and indeed many novel. Of course, the answer is only jackets, in fact all of the topics is on the basis to fabricate the story, just draw the bull's-eye after the first shooting, like, to borrow a word in the movie: Everything is predestined. Is not only to dominate the host, but the director.

　　I heard that obvious gap between rich and poor in India, religious contradictions and conflicts, but also their dirty, chaotic, know a little bad, but the movie is no cover up or when the display is quite shocking. I do not know whether the description of one of India are the real conditions of life, and the director as a foreigner, what is the Indian culture does not understand or because there is no worry about the lack of restrictions, finally showed life attitudes so that we can see at the bottom of people's livelihood, subjected to the low status of life and the lives of the threat of embarrassment, the fight of life and will have a different direction, which eventually led to the fate of no passers-by. In fact, this kind of subject matter is not fresh, but how many movies can be excavated fresh material? For a way for a background description, still has enormous power.

　　However, we have to admit, the movie presents some of the poor even if the situation is not uncommon in China: the police beating trial at random, lawless hooligans, discrimination against wage earners and the poor ... ... so we have no reason to go are not eligible for contempt internal conflicts of a superpower, but perhaps we are not serious, may be controlled well, and nothing more. From this movie we can see a developing countries in the development of the many contradictions of our own sense is it has inspired!

　　One highlight of the movie are the actors find a prospective, especially the three protagonists, from hours to adult individuals of all three are playing, but not what people feel out of touch. Three individuals looked like, at the same time acting can exert excellent, can not be immersed in the drama of not meet all of a sudden, over-the director of natural ability can be seen deep.

　　但这部电影结尾处理落入俗套,结尾被轻易猜出.整部电影缺乏对哥哥舍利姆性格的细致描述,以致他多次转折稍显突兀,特别是最后放走卡提来更是缺乏说服力.可以说,舍利姆死在一堆钞票的浴缸里就是为了整部电影的“和谐”而做出的牺牲.另外,杰玛和卡提来的爱情也没有过多阐述,仅仅两个人小时候在一起过一段时间,也没见当中酝酿了多么深厚的感情,成年后相见就情不自禁抱在一起,一句“我爱你”就可以私定终身,直接冲淡了圆满结尾的感染力.这部电影可以再深刻的,但很可惜,导演为求得团圆而放弃了努力.

　　既然是一个圆满的结尾,好好享受也未尝不可,可电影结束后的一段歌舞,彻底把我从剧情中拉了出来.看着“杰玛”和“卡提拉”随着音乐狂放跳舞,让我明白这一切不过是一场戏,他们不过是演员而已,所有的表达未必是真,所有的感情未必发自内心.可以说,最后画蛇添足来了这么一段舞绝对是电影最大的败笔,被宝莱坞固有模式完全糟蹋.

　　我突然想起反映中国一段历史的《黄石的孩子》,导演同样是外国人.平心而论,这部电影制作精巧,水准很高,可惜太过冗长最后让人看得失去了耐心.然而,电影结束后,现实中当年那些孩子的幸存者讲述电影主人公的真实形象,却起到了很好的作用,甚至又能够将观众拉回剧情之中.现实与虚构的平衡,真的需要好好把握才能够令人认同.

　　But at the end of this movie fall into the conventional treatment, at the end was easy to guess. Seselj brother整部电影lack of detailed description of al the character, which he repeatedly turning slightly awkward, especially in the final release to more Mikati are unpersuasive. It can be said that Seselj al die at a pile of money for the bathtub is整部电影"harmonious" and make sacrifices. In addition, Gemma and Katy's love did not elaborate too much, just two young people together over time, but also not seen among the brewing for how deep the feelings of each other on an adult can not help but hold together, saying, "I love you "can be set for life private, direct to dilute the influence of a complete end. The film can be profound, but it is a pity that the director was seeking to abandon efforts to reunite.

　　Now that is a satisfactory end, enjoy it is not a bad idea can be a period after the end of movie songs and dances, from the story completely put me out of China and Latin America. Watching "Gemma" and "卡提拉" With the wild dance music, so I see all this is a drama, but they are just actors, all the expression is not necessarily true, not all of the feelings of his heart. It can be said that the final has come such a superfluous dance movies are the absolute biggest failure was inherent in Bollywood completely ruined.

　　I suddenly think of Chinese history to reflect the "Yellowstone of the child", the director is a foreigner same. In all fairness, the film production of compact, high quality, but too long and the last people to see lost patience. However, after the movie, when in reality the child survivors of those movies about the true image of the heroine, but has played a good role, and even then will the audience be able to back into the story. The balance of reality and fiction, really need to make good use of it can only agree.

问题3：贫民窟的百万富翁英文影评谁有啊,长点的[英语科目]

下面是洛杉矶时报的评论文章,另外附了两个链接,一个链接是英国的一个电影网站,上面有各个媒体的电影评论综合.还有一个是纽约时报的关于slumdog millionnaire的影评：

A game-show backdrop lets 'Slumdog Millionaire' weave a dynamic tale of life and love

By Kenneth Turan MOVIE CRITIC

Who would believe that the best old-fashioned audience picture of the year, a Hollywood-style romantic melodrama that delivers major studio satisfactions in an ultra-modern way, was made on the streets of India with largely unknown stars by a British director who never makes the same movie twice? Go figure. ¶ That would be the hard-to-resist "Slumdog Millionaire," with director Danny Boyle adding independent film touches to a story of star-crossed romance that the original Warner brothers would have embraced, shamelessly pulling out stops that you wouldn't think anyone would have the nerve to attempt anymore. ¶ But Boyle has been nothing if not bold with this film. He's dared to use so many venerable movie elements it's dizzying, dared us to say we won't be moved or involved, dared us to say we're too hip to fall for tricks that are older than we are. And, as witnessed by "Slumdog's" capturing of the Toronto Film Festival's often prophetic audience award, he's won that bet. ¶ Because he's a director who is always up for something different, Boyle's films run an unmatchable gamut, from the punk operatics of "Trainspotting" to the sweetness of "Millions," the shock of "28 Days Later" and the science-fiction theatrics of "Sunshine." What unites all of them, though, is the unstoppable cinematic energy pouring off the screen that's at the heart of Boyle's always vigorous style.

Given that, it was perhaps inevitable that the director would end up making a film in India, plugging effortlessly into the phenomenal liveliness and nonstop street life of the place. And he's upped the ante by hiring the great A.R. Rahman, the king of Bollywood music, to contribute one of his unmistakable propulsive scores.

ADVERTISEMENT

All this dynamism is at the service of a script by "The Full Monty's" Simon Beaufoy, which is in turn based on "Q&A," a novel by Vikas Swarup that involves, of all things, the Indian version of the hit TV show "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire." If this sounds like unlikely source material for involving cinema, you're not alone in your thoughts: Boyle initially had the same reaction.

What won the director over is the dynamic, almost Dickensian arc of "Slumdog's" story, which begins with a multiple-choice question typed on the screen. "Jamal Malik is one question away from winning 20 million rupees," it reads. "How did he do it? A) He cheated. B) He's lucky. C) He's a genius. D) It is written."

Jamal Malik (Dev Patel of the British TV series "Skins"), the slumdog of the title, turns out to be an impoverished 18-year-old orphan who works hurriedly serving tea to harried telephone solicitors in the great city of Mumbai.

We see Jamal in two places almost at once in the film's cross-cut opening. He's on stage on the "Millionaire" telecast, being needled by Prem (Anil Kapoor), the show's arrogant host. And he's also in a police station the night before the final telecast, being brutally interrogated ("Slumdog" is rated R for "some violence, disturbing images and language") because no one can believe that such a lowly, uneducated person has been able to answer all the questions that he has.

To get back on the show for the final question -- by explaining to the dubious police inspector (Irfan Khan) how he came to know what he does -- Jamal has to tell him (and us) the story of his life, a story where, in true Frank Capra fashion, chance, luck, suffering and street smarts all play major parts.

Jamal's companion in most things is his older brother, Salim (Madhur Mittal), a hard-headed cynic where Jamal is a passionate dreamer, the kind of kid who is willing, in one of the film's most piquant scenes, to literally wade through the offal from an outhouse to get to his hero, Indian film legend Amitabh Bachchan.

Because Jamal's and Salim's lives are full of incident despite their youth, it takes three actors apiece to tell their stories. The youngest of them are Hindi-speaking street kids whom casting director Loveleen Tandan (whose work was so crucial that Boyle gives her a co-director credit) both discovered and worked with closely.

As Jamal describes the specific incidents that led to his being able to answer each of the quiz show questions, he is simultaneously telling several stories, tales of the link between brothers, the never-ending battle with poverty, the lure and pitfalls of crime and the rapid modernization of India.

But most of all -- and it wouldn't be a Hollywood-style movie if this weren't true -- he's telling a romantic story as well, a tale of love at first sight with the beautiful Latika (played as an adult by Freida Pinto), a love that has to fight against all manner of privations, disappointments and despair.

To make this kind of story modern, Boyle and his team, especially cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantel and editor Chris Dickens, have told it in the jazziest way possible, breaking things up into numerous then and now sections and making the dark elements (like the torture used in the initial police interview) much darker than would have been the case in Hollywood's prime. The Warner brothers would have blanched at that, but they would have loved this story, and in that they would have been far from alone.

英国电影介绍的网站,比较好：rotten tomatoes.下面的网页直接链接到贫民富翁的那个影评集合部分：

http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/m/slumdog_millionaire/?critic=creamcrop

纽约时报影评：

http://movies.nytimes.com/2008/11/12/movies/12slum.html?partner=Rotten%20Tomatoes&ei=5083

问题4：高分求《贫民窟的百万富翁》的影评啊要长点的,顺便也给翻译成中文啊,

　　12号在美国加州举行颁奖典礼的第66届金球奖,把最佳影片、最佳导演、最佳剧本和最佳原创电影音乐四个大奖一股脑颁给了《贫民窟的百万富翁》.一个既悲惨又温暖的励志故事如此征服人心,可见人们对悲情和励志的需求是没有止境的——尤其是在经济危机的时候.

　　印度贫民窟里长大的杰玛只有18岁,但距离百万富翁只有一步之遥.他参加的一档名为《谁想成为百万富翁》的电视问答节目,过五关斩六将,只要他正确回答最后一道问题,令人垂涎的2000万卢比将归他所有.万众瞩目的答案即将揭晓的时候,警方却以他涉嫌作弊诈骗为由将他带走了.举报者和警察的怀疑倒也不是空穴来风：杰玛,这个贫民窟里的年轻穷光蛋,从未受过良好教育,只是一个给人斟茶倒水的waiter,怎么会答对一连串令专家学者也一筹莫展的冷僻问题?

　　1953年获得戛纳国际电影节大奖的印度电影《流浪者》,30年前受大陆观众追捧的程度,当今任何大片都望尘莫及,不少影院通宵放映仍一票难求.影片里的那句经典台词：“法官的儿子永远是法官,贼的儿子一定是个贼”,在倡导人人平等的革命之初,激起了异常强烈的抗争激情.孰料,仅仅过了十几年,1970年3月5日,“一打三反”运动进入高潮,北京工人体育场举行了公判大会,因为写一篇鼓吹平等的文章《出身论》,在现场十万人震耳欲聋的“打倒”声中,年仅27岁的遇罗克被“中国人民解放军北京市公检法军事管理委员会”以“现行反革命”罪判处死刑,立即执行.

　　半个多世纪之后,受到《流浪者》和遇罗克猛烈抨击的“血统论”,在《贫民窟的百万富翁》里以另一种形式出现了.杰玛受到严刑拷打.警察嘲笑杰玛缺乏常识（暗示他在作弊）,不甘示弱的杰玛反唇相讥：“你知道炸丸子多少钱一份?”

　　在警局的供诉,揭示了杰玛为何碰巧了知道那些问题的正确答案.那些答案伴随着杰玛充满血、眼泪和恐惧的人生轨迹,见证了印度普通百姓的悲欢离合,以及追求幸福生活的艰辛坎坷.大规模宗教冲突、险恶的孤儿院、颠沛流离的浪荡生涯、黑帮团伙——大鱼吃小鱼,小鱼吃虾米,令人绝望和窒息的不公不义充斥着底层社会,弱肉强食的丛林法则威胁着每一个人.相依为命的哥哥干起了刀口添血的杀手行当,初恋女友沦落风尘,不变的惟有杰玛那颗善良、正直的心,和对爱情、正义、幸福的坚强信念与渴望.

　　在第一天的答题过程中,杰玛其实并不知道最后一道关键问题的正确答案.节目主持人故意地给杰玛以错误的提示,不料弄巧成拙,杰玛出人意料地反其意而答之,竟“蒙”对了正确答案.正是从暴力、阴谋、背叛里走来,杰玛不相信天上会掉下馅饼来,才一直走到举国瞩目的聚光灯下.杰玛在智力上战胜了自我感觉良好的电视台主持人,让后者恼羞成怒地报了警.

　　这部电影的成功得益于导演不粉饰、不矫情、不折腾.贫民窟里的残酷人生,印度这个亚洲新兴国家的梦想和希望,通过克制的镜头栩栩如生地展现在观众眼前.主角杰玛兄弟俩的童年、少年和青年时期,分别由六个演员扮演.他们和这部电影有一样的气质：清新质朴,动人心魄.这种气质先后让他们赢得了第33届多伦多国际电影节的“人民选择奖”,英国独立电影奖最佳英国独立电影、最佳导演以及最佳新人奖.在金球奖之前,他们还获得了2008国家影评人协会颁发的最佳影片、最佳新人和最佳改编剧本奖.这里有必要顺便八卦一下.1966年国家影评人协会成立的时候,成员都是被纽约影评人协会拒绝的电影评论家,所以这个奖已经成了和奥斯卡背道而驰的标志.历史上,他们评出来的最佳影片只有四部和奥斯卡最佳影片是重叠的.独立制作的小成本电影《贫民窟的百万富翁》的奥斯卡之旅,会不会和杰玛的命运一样?

问题5：求“贫民窟的百万富翁”观后感,英文的最好……水平高中[英语科目]

This is a story about one path leading to the final success is people's endurance and resolution,of course,some certain good luck also count.

Let's give some further explanation about this path.First of all,as an indispensible element resulting in success,endurance plays an important role in the course of people's life.Directly speaking,it's hard for people to get to his destination without it.As for the resolution,just like the hero performing in this movie,determines his final fate.He has dream in his deepest heart,and he has the resolution to make it come true,eventually,by means of it,his dream has been realized.

Above these elements mentioned above,good luck is also important.Sometimes,it can help push things forward.

In all,we can not be of successful without our hard work.